Author:
Georgiadis L.,Ruiz-Teran A. M.,Stafford P. J.
Abstract
<p>Under-deck cable-stayed (UDCS) and under-deck suspension (UDS) footbridges are slender structures supported by cables located below the deck and, despite the similarities in their appearance, they represent two different engineering concepts. In the present work, their structural behaviour has been investigated in detail and their response under static and dynamic pedestrian loading has been compared. A static analysis has been conducted first. Then a modal analysis has been performed, followed by a full time-history dynamic analysis under the action of a stochastic pedestrian load model. The influence of geometric non-linearity in both static and dynamic analyses has been examined. Results show that although the bending moments and deflections in UDS footbridges are smaller compared to UDCS footbridges, the level of accelerations, which is the governing design criterion for the bridge deck in order to satisfy comfort, is similar.</p>
Publisher
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
Reference11 articles.
1. OGAWA-STUDIO.COM. 小川重雄写真事務所 | Ogawa Studio. [online] Available at: http://ogawa-studio.com/ [Accessed 7 Dec. 2018].
2. STRUCTURAE.NET. Structurae - International Database and Gallery of Structures. [online] Available at: https://structurae.net/en/ [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].
3. Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges. Part 1: Single-span bridges;A. M. Ruiz-Teran;Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering / Revue canadienne de génie civil
4. Structural behaviour and design criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges and combined cable-stayed bridges. Part 2: Multispan bridges.;A. M. Ruiz-Teran;Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering / Revue canadienne de génie civil
5. Parameters governing the response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges;A M Ruiz-Teran;Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering / Revue canadienne de génie civil