Performance-based fire design and the U.S. prescriptive guidelines: A comparative study

Author:

Elhami-Khorasani Negar1,Fang Chenyang1,Gernay Thomas2

Affiliation:

1. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

2. University of Liege, Liege, Belgium

Abstract

<p>Current codes and standards for fire design of structures in the United States are mainly based on design at the component level using prescriptive approaches, while performance-based design for fire can be used to address the needs for designing modern buildings with cost-effective solutions. Previous research shows that, when system-level performance is considered, fire protection on secondary beam elements in composite steel-concrete floor systems is not necessary due to the development of a membrane action in the concrete slab during fire. This study compares the fire design of a 9-story office building using prescriptive and performance-based designs. The safety levels of the two designs are investigated and compared. It is shown that performance-based design can be used to achieve the required level of safety currently enforced in the U.S. prescriptive guidelines, while providing an opportunity for cost reduction in fire protection material.</p>

Publisher

International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)

Reference19 articles.

1. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL). Fire Resistance Directory. Vol. 1, Northbrook, IL; 2003.

2. Wang YC. Tensile membrane action in slabs and its application to the Cardington fire tests. Fire, static and dynamic tests of building structures. Proceedings of the Second Cardington Conference, England. 12–14 March. 1996; p. 55–67.

3. Bailey CG, Moore DB. The structural behaviour of steel frames with composite floorslabs subject to fire: Part 1: Theory. The Structural Engineer. 2000; 78(11): 19–27.

4. Huang Z, Burgess IW, Plank RJ. Modelling of six full-scale fire tests on a composite building. The Structural Engineer. 2002; 80(19): 30–7.

5. Gillie M, Usmani AS, Rotter JM. A structural analysis of the Cardington British Steel Corner Test. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2002; 58: 427–42.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3