TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE BELIEFS INVENTORY IN ADULTS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY
Author:
Çak Üçler Edanur1ORCID, Altunkürek Şeyma Zehra2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GÜLHANE HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, HALK SAĞLIĞI HEMŞİRELİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Aims: This study was conducted to establish the Turkish validity and reliability of the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Beliefs Inventory (CAMBI) used to measure adults' beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine practices.
Methods: The study was designed as a methodological study. The population of the study consisted of individuals receiving services from a family health center in Ankara. The sample consisted of 354 individuals who agreed to participate in the study and met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum) of the data obtained in the study were calculated. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted to test validity. The reliability of the scale was assessed through item-total correlation, item analysis, Cronbach α, and test-retest correlation.
Results: The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that there is only one factor with an eigenvalue above 1, explaining 73.11% of the total variance. Additionally, fit indices obtained from the results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis yielded a χ2/df fit index of 3.214, a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.079, a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.901, and an Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) of 0.854. The Cronbach’s α value of the scale in our study was 0.97.
Conclusion: The adapted Turkish version of the 16-item scale has been determined to be a measurement tool that adheres to validity and reliability criteria. It serves as an assessment instrument usable by healthcare professionals to evaluate adult individuals' beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods.
Publisher
University of Health Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Adeniyi, O., Washington, L., Glenn, C. J., Franklin, S. G., Scott, A., Aung, M., ... & Jolly, P. E. (2021). The use of complementary and alternative medicine among hypertensive and type 2 diabetic patients in Western Jamaica: A mixed methods study. PloS One, 16(2), e0245163. 2. Aktaş, B. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bütüncül tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıbba karşı tutumları. Hemşirelik Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 3(2), 55-59. 3. Biçer, İ., & Balçık, P. Y. (2019). Geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp: Türkiye ve seçilen ülkelerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 22(1), 245-257. 4. Bilge, A., Uğuryol, M., Dülgerler, Ş., & Yıldız, M. (2018). Tamamlayıcı tedavileri kullanmaya yönelik tutum ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 55-63. 5. Bishop, F. L., Yardley, L., & Lewith, G. (2005). Developing a measure of treatment beliefs: the complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13(2), 144-149.
|
|