TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE BELIEFS INVENTORY IN ADULTS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY

Author:

Çak Üçler Edanur1ORCID,Altunkürek Şeyma Zehra2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GÜLHANE HEMŞİRELİK FAKÜLTESİ, HEMŞİRELİK BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, HALK SAĞLIĞI HEMŞİRELİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI

Abstract

Aims: This study was conducted to establish the Turkish validity and reliability of the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Beliefs Inventory (CAMBI) used to measure adults' beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine practices. Methods: The study was designed as a methodological study. The population of the study consisted of individuals receiving services from a family health center in Ankara. The sample consisted of 354 individuals who agreed to participate in the study and met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum) of the data obtained in the study were calculated. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted to test validity. The reliability of the scale was assessed through item-total correlation, item analysis, Cronbach α, and test-retest correlation. Results: The results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that there is only one factor with an eigenvalue above 1, explaining 73.11% of the total variance. Additionally, fit indices obtained from the results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis yielded a χ2/df fit index of 3.214, a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.079, a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.901, and an Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index (AGFI) of 0.854. The Cronbach’s α value of the scale in our study was 0.97. Conclusion: The adapted Turkish version of the 16-item scale has been determined to be a measurement tool that adheres to validity and reliability criteria. It serves as an assessment instrument usable by healthcare professionals to evaluate adult individuals' beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods.

Publisher

University of Health Science

Reference47 articles.

1. Adeniyi, O., Washington, L., Glenn, C. J., Franklin, S. G., Scott, A., Aung, M., ... & Jolly, P. E. (2021). The use of complementary and alternative medicine among hypertensive and type 2 diabetic patients in Western Jamaica: A mixed methods study. PloS One, 16(2), e0245163.

2. Aktaş, B. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bütüncül tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıbba karşı tutumları. Hemşirelik Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 3(2), 55-59.

3. Biçer, İ., & Balçık, P. Y. (2019). Geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp: Türkiye ve seçilen ülkelerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 22(1), 245-257.

4. Bilge, A., Uğuryol, M., Dülgerler, Ş., & Yıldız, M. (2018). Tamamlayıcı tedavileri kullanmaya yönelik tutum ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 55-63.

5. Bishop, F. L., Yardley, L., & Lewith, G. (2005). Developing a measure of treatment beliefs: the complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 13(2), 144-149.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3