Reflex testing to define action limits for community-based requests

Author:

Barron Jeffrey1,Ng Charles1,Aspin Lisa1,Robinson Lisa-Jane1,Smith Geoff2

Affiliation:

1. Biochemistry Department, Labtests, PO Box 12049, Penrose, Auckland1642

2. Southern Community Laboratories, Dunedin Hospital, 201 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand

Abstract

Background Critical values are required to be phoned 24/7. Other abnormal results fall short of the thresholds used to define critical values and may only be required to be phoned during the day. Community-based requestors prefer not to be contacted unless a result is critical and contacting them requires substantial staff resource. It is common practice to add tests to requests to expedite diagnosis or clarify the significance of a particular result using algorithms. Methods We devised algorithms for reflex addition of tests which allowed the differentiation of significantly abnormal results as either critical values or those that only require day phoning. Results Algorithms identified 158 out of 309 tests as being critical (51%) over nine months. Reflex addition of serum bicarbonate identified 4% of serum glucose (24.9–37.9 mmol/L) as critical. Use of estimated glomerular filtration rate by reflex addition of serum creatinine identified 68% of serum lithium (1.49–1.99 mmol/L) as critical. Addition of serum potassium, calcium and magnesium identified 21% of serum digoxin (>2.49 nmol/L) as critical and addition of serum potassium and calcium to all samples with serum magnesium (<0.31 mmol/L) identified hypocalcaemia in all cases. The addition of serum creatinine and potassium as markers for rhabdomyolysis-induced acute renal failure did not help in the differentiation of serum creatine kinase > 4999 μ/L. Conclusions Use of reflex tests helped inform a phoning system based on the division of results into critical values and non-emergency abnormal values. This avoids disturbing requestors unnecessarily and conserves staff time at night.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3