Minimum requirements for remote realtime fetal tele-ultrasound consultation

Author:

Chan F Y,Whitehall J,Hayes L,Taylor A,Soong B,Lessing K,Cincotta R,Cooper D,Stone M,Lee-Tannock A,Baker S,Smith M,Green E,Whiting R

Abstract

We studied the transmission bandwidth required for accurate diagnoses when performing realtime fetal tele-ultrasound consultations. The study was divided into three phases. In phase I, three experienced clinicians evaluated the quality of ultrasound images transmitted at various bandwidths (internally looped back within Brisbane) using eight commercially available codecs at random. The two codecs that performed best proceeded to phase 2, in which a realtime video-link of up to 2Mbit/s was set up between Brisbane and Townsville (1500 km apart). Testing with a standard video-tape was performed at seven different bandwidths selected at random, with four clinicians (who were blinded to the equipment and bandwidths used). The optimum line rates for transmission were determined, and testing was then performed using these line rates for fetuses with various anomalies (phase 3). The results showed significant differences in performance according to bandwidths used, but not according to observers. Bandwidths were grouped into three levels. At level I (256 kbit/s) the performance was significantly worse than at level II (384, 512 or 768 kbit/s), which was in turn worse than that at level III (1, 1.5 or 2Mbit/s). However, within each level, performance at one bandwidth was not significantly different from that at the others. The most cost-effective transmission rates therefore appeared to be 384kbit/s and 1Mbit/s. Further testing with fetuses affected by various anomalies confirmed that the majority could be diagnosed using a 384 kbit/s link, with slight improvement in evaluation when the bandwidth was increased to 1 Mbit/s.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3