Antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing: women's perceptions of 'information' and 'consent'

Author:

Ahmed Shenaz1,Green Josephine2,Hewison Jenny3

Affiliation:

1. Research Fellow , Academic Unit of Psychiatry & Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LT, UK

2. Professor of Psychosocial Reproductive Health, Mother & Infant Research Unit, University of York, York Y10 5DD, UK

3. Professor of the Psychology of Health Care, Academic Unit of Psychiatry & Behavioural Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LT, UK

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the attitudes of a sample of pregnant women in the UK towards informed consent for antenatal thalassaemia carrier testing and perceived pre-test information needs for such testing. Setting: The study was conducted in two cities in the North of England, where participants were recruited via Midwifery and Genetic services. Method: In all, 110 Pakistani women tested and not found to be thalassaemia carriers completed a questionnaire, 14 of whom were also interviewed. Thirty-six women identified as carriers or possible carriers completed a questionnaire and were interviewed. The questionnaires assessed whether women were aware that they had been tested for thalassaemia carrier status, whether they were asked for their consent for such testing, and their pre-test information preferences. The interviews explored women's beliefs about 'informed consent' in more depth. Results: Women had received little or no pre-test information and said that they would have preferred to be informed that they were being tested, but they did not expect, or express a desire, to be asked for their informed consent. Conclusion: While information was important to women, consenting was not. Overall, women discussed 'information' and 'consent' as two separate issues, thus challenging assumptions around the term informed consent. Women wanted pre-test information because they wanted to know more about the tests that they would be having, not to use it to make decisions about whether to have the tests.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3