Physician attitudes towards chronic disease management in the USA

Author:

Lee Doohee1,Begley Charles E.2

Affiliation:

1. Marshall University, College of Business, Graduate School of Management, Department of Management, Marketing, MIS, Charleston, USA

2. The University of Texas School of Public Health - Management and Policy Sciences, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Whereas physician support of disease management (DM) is recognized as important for improving the quality and effectiveness of care of individuals with chronic illness, little is known about physicians’ perceptions of the model or their likelihood of adoption. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted of a 2008 nationally representative sample of practising physicians in the USA who had been exposed to DM programmes ( n = 1615) to determine their support for DM and how attitudes differ across physicians. Results indicated that the majority of physicians believe in the quality enhancing benefits of DM programmes, but there are systematic differences in the attitudes towards DM of different types of physicians. Physicians affiliated with health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and hospital-based practices are more likely than other physicians to agree that DM programmes improve their ability to provide high-quality care to patients with chronic conditions. Minority physicians and physicians who perceive their market as more competitive, have a more positive attitude towards DM than white physicians and physicians in less competitive markets. International medical graduates hold relatively positive attitudes about the benefits of DM programmes and older physicians are more likely than their young peers to approve of DM and physicians. Physicians with a higher percentage of patients with chronic conditions are more likely to have a favourable view of DM. Specialty physicians are more likely to have a positive view of DM, and DM-exposed physicians are more likely to perceive that DM programmes lead to improved quality of care. Future study is needed to determine the reasons for these differences in attitudes and whether they can be modified by targeted information.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3