Do multidisciplinary team members correctly interpret the abbreviations used in the medical records?

Author:

Parvaiz M1,Singh Gk1,Hafeez R2,Sharma H3

Affiliation:

1. St. Richard's Hospital, Spitalfield Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 6SE, UK.

2. King's Mill Hospital, Mansfield Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottingham NG17 4JL UK.

3. Royal Alexandra Hospital, Corsebar Road, Paisley PA2 9PN, UK

Abstract

Background and Aims Abbreviations are commonly used in the medical world to save time and space whilst writing in the patients’ case notes. As various specialties have evolved, each has developed a collection of commonly used abbreviations within its practice, which may not be easily recognisable to those working as an allied branch. The purpose of this study was to assess whether we, the multidisciplinary team members, interpret the abbreviations used in the medical records correctly? Methods and Results We analysed orthopaedic inpatient admission case notes (n = 45) for the use of abbreviations (n = 57) and their appreciation by different members of the multidisciplinary team (n = 175) by means of a standardised questionnaire. We found a wide variation in understanding and interpretation of orthopaedic abbreviations among health care professionals. Even the orthopaedic surgeons could answer correctly 57.2% only, followed by physiotherapists (49.9%). Non-orthopaedic groups produced significantly less number of correct answers than the orthopaedic surgeons (p <0.019). Interestingly, nursing and physiotherapy departments produced significantly fewer mal-interpretations than the orthopaedic surgeons (p <0.023). Conclusions Whilst abbreviations may indeed save time, the use of confusing abbreviations is unacceptable. We recommend that acronym obsession should be discouraged in order to reduce possible clinical error.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3