Need(le)less Worry

Author:

McCombe Kate

Abstract

Incapacitated patients must be treated in their best interests according to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. As a result of this statute, the General Medical Council has advised that the testing of incapacitated source patients for HIV following occupational needlestick injury is unlawful. In this article, the reasons for the introduction of the Act are outlined and the impact of the legislation on the profession discussed. It is argued that it is in the patient's medical best interests to know if they are HIV positive so that they can be treated appropriately whilst they are incapacitated on ICU and begin timely medical therapy. It is in their social, emotional, cultural and religious best interests to be tested so that they can alleviate the anxiety of the injured healthcare worker, change their behaviour to avoid further spread and contribute to wider society as a ‘good egg’. It is concluded that the GMC has misunderstood the meaning of best interests and that their advice should be revised to allow testing to occur.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,General Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. BrazierM, CaveE. Medicine, Patients and the Law. London: Penguin Books; 2007;125

2. Needlestuck

3. Reflections on ‘Needlestuck’

4. Editorial: Need(le)less confusion

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3