Recommendations for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand

Author:

Tate Jillian1,Caldwell Grahame2,Daly James3,Gillis David4,Jenkins Margaret5,Jovanovich Sue6,Martin Helen7,Steele Richard8,Wienholt Louise9,Mollee Peter10

Affiliation:

1. Chemical Pathology Department, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4029

2. Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, New South Wales

3. Haematology Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania

4. Immunology Department, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland

5. Biochemistry Department, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria

6. RCPA Immunology QAP, SA Pathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide

7. Biochemistry Department, Healthscope Pathology, Wayville, South Australia, Australia

8. Immunology Department, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand

9. Clinical Immunology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales

10. Haematology Department, Pathology Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Background Although protein electrophoresis of serum (SPEP) and urine (UPEP) specimens is a well-established laboratory technique, the reporting of results using this important method varies considerably between laboratories. The Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists recognized a need to adopt a standardized approach to reporting SPEP and UPEP by clinical laboratories. Methods A Working Party considered available data including published literature and clinical studies, together with expert opinion in order to establish optimal reporting practices. A position paper was produced, which was subsequently revised through a consensus process involving scientists and pathologists with expertise in the field throughout Australia and New Zealand. Results Recommendations for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis have been produced. These cover analytical requirements: detection systems; serum protein and albumin quantification; fractionation into alpha-1, alpha-2, beta and gamma fractions; paraprotein quantification; urine Bence Jones protein quantification; paraprotein characterization; and laboratory performance, expertise and staffing. The recommendations also include general interpretive commenting and commenting for specimens with paraproteins and small bands together with illustrative examples of reports. Conclusions Recommendations are provided for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand. It is expected that such standardized reporting formats will reduce both variation between laboratories and the risk of misinterpretation of results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3