Affiliation:
1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Macewen Building, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
2. BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, Scotland
Abstract
Background Primary aldosteronism (PA), the most common secondary cause of hypertension, can be screened for using the aldosterone/renin ratio. This ratio is raised in PA and its accuracy depends on the ability to measure plasma renin at extremely low concentrations. Methods We compared two different procedures for assessing plasma renin. The conventional method, which measures plasma renin activity (PRA), is technically demanding and laborious, and the Diasorin Liaison® method, which measures plasma renin concentration (PRC), is an automated immunoassay. Results from each method were used to calculate the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) and the performance of the Diasorin Liaison® method compared with that of the conventional assay using receiver operator characteristic curves. Results The analytical and functional sensitivity of the PRC method were 2.1 and 5 μIU/mL, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay precision were <7.2% and 10.4%, respectively. There was significant (9%) prorenin interference. Samples with PRA > 1.0 ng/mL/h showed significant correlation with PRC ( r = 0.93; P < 0.05; n = 146); however, with PRA < 1.0 ng/mL/h, no significant correlation occurred ( r = 0.14; P < 0.05; n = 79). An aldosterone (pmol/L)/PRC(μIU/mL) ratio of >35, in patients with aldosterone >300 pmol/L, resulted in 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity, when compared with the commonly accepted aldosterone (pmol/L)/PRA (ng/mL/h) ratio of >750, in identifying patients who may suffer from PA. Conclusion This study indicates the feasibility of using the automated PRC assay as a replacement for the conventional manual PRA assay in calculating the ARR as a first-line screen for PA.
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献