Videoconferencing in child and adolescent psychiatry in Finland – an inadequately exploited resource

Abstract

To assess the current role of videoconferencing and the purposes for which it has been used in child and adolescent psychiatry in Finland, we sent a 16-item questionnaire to all providers of child and adolescent psychiatry services in specialised health care in Finland, i.e. the 42 child and adolescent units in 21 hospital districts. All service providers responded. The responses to both open-ended and structured questions were analysed manually and classified quantitatively and qualitatively. Use of videoconferencing was reported by 16 of the 21 hospital districts in Finland. Videoconferencing had been used for more than 5.5 years in only three hospital districts, for 3–5 years in 14 units and for 1–3 years in six units. Videoconferencing was used for clinical work in 12 and for distance education in another 12 hospital districts. Videoconferencing was used weekly for clinical work and for supervision by two districts; it was used for education by three districts. Although the workers' experiences of and attitudes towards videoconferencing were favourable, it has not been widely used in child and adolescent psychiatry. The implementation of videoconferencing seems to depend more on the activity of service providers than on the number of people involved.