Affiliation:
1. Specialist Registrar in Forensic Psychiatry
2. East Midlands Centre for Forensic Mental Health
3. Specialist Registrar in General Psychiatry
4. Senior Lecturer
5. Division of Forensic Mental Health, University of Leicester
Abstract
Although probation orders with conditions for psychiatric treatment (POPTs) have been in existence for many years there is very little literature relating to their use and almost none from a psychiatric perspective. All patients who were subject to, or had recently completed, a POPT in Leicestershire were identified and information on them collected from psychiatric and probation records. Of 33 POPTs identified, psychiatric information was found for 31 and probation for 23. The most striking feature of the sample was its great heterogeneity in terms of psychiatric diagnoses and index offences. Worryingly, a number of serious offences did not lead to charges or convictions and there was evidence of poor communication between and within agencies, particularly psychiatric services. Our recommendations for improvement mirror those of other studies in the area, namely, better training of the staff from the multiple agencies involved, improved communication, better documentation and ongoing audit to prevent the situation continuing.
Subject
Law,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献