The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the Forensic Pathologist: Ethical considerations

Author:

DE LA GRANDMAISON G LORIN1,DURIGON M2,MOUTEL G3,HERVE C4

Affiliation:

1. Assistant professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France

2. >Professor and Head of Department, Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France

3. Assistant professor, Department of Medical Ethics, Necker Medical University, Réné Descartes University, Paris, France

4. Professor and Head of Department, Department of Medical Ethics, Necker Medical University, Réné Descartes University, Paris, France

Abstract

Since 1991, war crimes in the former Yugoslavia have been the subject of several international medico-legal investigations of mass graves within the framework of inquiries led by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Forensic pathologists involved in the ICTY missions could be subjected to ethical tensions due to the difficulties of the missions, the emergent conflicts between forensic scientists of the investigating teams and the original nature of the ICTY proceedings. In order to study the nature of such ethical tensions, we sent a questionnaire to 65 forensic pathologists who have been involved in the ICTY missions. The rate of response was 38%. The majority of forensic pathologists questioned (n=18) did not know how the medico-legal data was exploited by the ICTY. Three of them have been subjected to pressures. Three of them were aware of mass grave sites knowingly not investigated by the ICTY. Fifteen considered that the ICTY respected the elementary rules of the law and four of them questioned the impartiality of the justice led by the ICTY. Two conflicting types of ethics can be drawn from these results: conviction ethics, which are shared by most of the forensic pathologists questioned, and responsibility ethics. In the former, the forensic pathologist completely agrees with the need for an international war crimes tribunal, even if such justice can be challenged regarding the respect of human rights and impartiality. In the latter, he or she needs to conduct him or herself in ways that do not infringe impartiality. As medical deontology duty requires impartiality ethics, discursive ethics are needed to ease ethical tensions and to suggest ethical guidelines. Alternatives to international justice, through a truth and reconciliation commission and by way of humanitarian missions combining victims' identification with forensic investigations for historical purposes, could be considered.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Jasenovac;Medicine, Science and the Law;2020-07-21

2. Death in Custody: Towards an International Framework for Investigation and Prevention;Emerging Issues in Prison Health;2016-08-06

3. Cognitive Dissonance and the Military-Archaeology Complex;Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence;2014-10-01

4. The investigation of deaths in custody: A qualitative analysis of problems and prospects;Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine;2014-07

5. Improving International Criminal Investigations into Mass Graves: Synthesizing Experiences from the Former Yugoslavia;Journal of Human Rights Practice;2012-09-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3