False-positive results from colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain), 2000–2010

Author:

Garcia Montse1,Milà Núria1,Binefa Gemma1,Borràs Josep Maria2,Espinàs Josep Alfons2,Moreno Víctor3

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Prevention and Control Group, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Institute of Oncology-ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

2. Cancer Prevention and Control Group, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Cancer Plan, Catalan Health Government, Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona – Department of Clinical Sciences, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

3. Catalan Institute of Oncology-ICO, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona – Department of Clinical Sciences, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Colorectal Cancer Group, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Objective To identify factors associated with a false-positive result in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme with the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Catalonia between 2000 and 2010. Methods The study population consisted of participants of the Catalan CRC screening programme with a positive FOBT who underwent a colonoscopy for diagnostic confirmation from 2000 to 2010. A false-positive result was defined as having a positive test but detecting no high-risk adenoma or cancer in the follow-up colonoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify sociodemographic and screening variables related to false-positive results. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results Over the screening period, 1074 (1.7%) of the 63,332 screening tests had a positive result in the Catalan CRC screening programme. The false-positive proportion was 55.2% (n = 546). Women were more likely to have a positive FOBT in the absence of CRC neoplasia than men (adjusted OR = 2.91; 95% CI: 2.22–3.28). During the first prevalence round, the proportion of false-positive results was higher than in subsequent rounds (69.5% vs. 48.9%; P < 0.05). Re-screening and having a bleeding pathology such as haemorrhoids or anal fissures were also associated with a false-positive result. Conclusion The proportion of false-positive results and the associated risks should be estimated to provide an eligible population with more reliable information on the adverse effects of screening.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3