Comparison of different aminoglycoside antibiotic treatments to refine ototoxicity studies in adult mice

Author:

Murillo-Cuesta S1,Contreras J12,Cediel R13,Varela-Nieto I1

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas ‘Alberto Sols’, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Unit 761 CIBERER, Arturo Duperier 4, Madrid 28029, Spain

2. Dpto. Anatomía

3. Dpto. Medicina y Cirugía, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain

Abstract

Hearing and balance receptors in the inner ear are highly susceptible to damage caused by a wide variety of toxic substances, including aminoglycosides. This class of antibiotics is commonly used in medicine, even though they may produce irreversible bilateral neurosensorial deafness. To identify potential ototoxic agents and novel therapeutic targets, it is necessary to generate standardized animal models of aminoglycoside ototoxicity, which will also serve to explore otic cell repair and regeneration. Although the mouse is the species most often used in biomedical research, due to the genetic information and genetically-modified strains available, there are few standard models of aminoglycoside ototoxicity in adult mice. Most protocols to produce ototoxicity in adult mice employ high doses of aminoglycosides for long periods of time, which causes systemic toxicity, side-effects and high mortality rates. Here, we compare the effects of systemic treatment with four different, yet common, aminoglycoside antibiotics in two mouse strains, evaluating their effects on mortality, cochlear morphology and auditory brainstem responses. Our data indicate that gentamicin and neomycin caused high mortality in the adult mouse without significantly changing the auditory threshold. Amikacin produced a tolerable rate of mortality but at doses that did not exhibit ototoxicity. Finally, intramuscular injection of kanamycin in C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice induced significant dose-dependent bilateral hearing loss with a moderate rate of mortality and less discomfort than following subcutaneous administration.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3