Modern methods to assess accommodation reflex (literature review)

Author:

Shitikova A. V.1ORCID,Avagyan A. S.1ORCID,Avetisov K. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

2. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Abstract

Background. Determination of reflex accommodation indicators is of particular interest, both from clinical and scientific points of view. However, the heterogeneity of methods and approaches for evaluation of results obtained makes it necessary to compare and confront them in details.Purpose: to summarize and systematize the literature-based data of modern accommodation measurement methods.Methods. The analysis of domestic monographs was carried out. The domestic and foreign articles on eLibrary and PubMed within the last 20 years were analyzed. The articles with an incomplete selection criteria and statistically unreliable results (p < 0.05) were excluded.Results. Though the measurements of reflex accommodation indicators by subjective methods are consistent with each other, they are overestimated compared to the results of objective studies. Among the objective methods, special attention should be paid to the open-field autorefractometers as they level possible instrumental accommodation that is typical for the closed-field autorefractometers. Regarding this, it is necessary to clarify the methods used in the studies of this direction. By taking into account the indicators of reflex accommodation for assessing pathological conditions and treatment results, it is necessary to consider relative (i. e., comparative) measurement values but not absolute ones.Conclusion. The analysis of literature sources showed that the modern approaches of reflex accommodation study were very different. The methods discussed in this review are suitable for both clinical and scientific practice application. However, a mandatory reference to the method used is required for a correct assessment of results.

Publisher

Academy of Medical Optics and Optometry

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3