Abstract
Abstract
The article presents a comparative study of shale gas media debates in Germany and Poland. Drawing from the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD), it addresses discursive conflicts over the use of hydraulic fracturing and its environmental impacts in both countries. The authors relate their analysis to the theoretical debate that emerged in the 1990s in French sociology concerning the question of “green justifications” that form a specific way of how social actors intervene, dispute, and build compromises in public discussions to protect non-human entities. Referring to these discussions, this article identifies several ecological justification clusters and the associated social actors that are ‘compromised’ or enclosed in existing orders of worth.
Reference82 articles.
1. Der Brennstoff im Gestein. Mit neuer Technik sollen die Gasvorräte in tiefen Schieferschichten angezapft werden;Asendorpf, Dirk,2010
2. The Climatization of Global Politics: Introduction to the Special Issue;Aykut, Stefan C.,2021
3. Capital and Carbon: The Shifting Common Good Justification of Energy Regimes;Beamish, Thomas D.,2017
4. World Risk Society;Beck, Ulrich,1999
5. The Social Construction of Reality;Berger, Peter L.,1966
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Umweltdiskurse;Handbuch Umweltsoziologie;2024
2. Umweltdiskurse;Handbuch Umweltsoziologie;2023