Affiliation:
1. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
2. Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract
SUMMARYThe metabolic cost of running is substantial, despite the savings from elastic energy storage and return. Previous studies suggest that generating vertical force to support body weight and horizontal forces to brake and propel body mass are the major determinants of the metabolic cost of running. In the present study, we investigated how independently altering body weight and body mass affects the metabolic cost of running. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that reducing body weight would decrease metabolic rate proportionally, and adding mass and weight would increase metabolic rate proportionally. Further, because previous studies show that adding mass alone does not affect the forces generated on the ground, we hypothesized that adding mass alone would have no substantial effect on metabolic rate. We manipulated the body weight and body mass of 10 recreational human runners and measured their metabolic rates while they ran at 3 m s–1. We reduced weight using a harness system, increased mass and weight using lead worn about the waist, and increased mass alone using a combination of weight support and added load. We found that net metabolic rate decreased in less than direct proportion to reduced body weight, increased in slightly more than direct proportion to added load (added mass and weight), and was not substantially different from normal running with added mass alone. Adding mass alone was not an effective method for determining the metabolic cost attributable to braking/propelling body mass. Runners loaded with mass alone did not generate greater vertical or horizontal impulses and their metabolic costs did not substantially differ from those of normal running. Our results show that generating force to support body weight is the primary determinant of the metabolic cost of running. Extrapolating our reduced weight data to zero weight suggests that supporting body weight comprises at most 74% of the net cost of running. However, 74% is probably an overestimate of the metabolic demand of body weight to support itself because in reduced gravity conditions decrements in horizontal impulse accompanied decrements in vertical impulse.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Alexander, R. M. (1991). Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. J. Exp. Biol.160, 55-69.
2. Biewener, A. A. (1989). Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. Science245, 45-48.
3. Biewener, A. A. (1990). Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion. Science250,1097-1103.
4. Biewener, A. A., Farley, C. T., Roberts, T. J. and Temaner,M. (2004). Muscle mechanical advantage of human walking and running: implications for energy cost. J. Appl. Physiol.97,2266-2274.
5. Bijker, K. E. (2003). Metabolic cost of running and walking. PhD thesis, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献