Rostral hindbrain patterning involves the direct activation of aKrox20transcriptional enhancer by Hox/Pbx and Meis factors
Author:
Wassef Michel A.12, Chomette Diane12, Pouilhe Marie12, Stedman Aline34, Havis Emmanuelle34, Desmarquet-Trin Dinh Carole12, Schneider-Maunoury Sylvie34, Gilardi-Hebenstreit Pascale12, Charnay Patrick12, Ghislain Julien12
Affiliation:
1. INSERM, U784, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire du Développement and 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris, France. 2. Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris, France. 3. CNRS UMR 7622, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, 75252 Paris,France. 4. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 9 quai Saint Bernard, 75005 Paris,France.
Abstract
The morphogenesis of the vertebrate hindbrain involves the generation of metameric units called rhombomeres (r), and Krox20 encodes a transcription factor that is expressed in r3 and r5 and plays a major role in this segmentation process. Our knowledge of the basis of Krox20regulation in r3 is rather confusing, especially concerning the involvement of Hox factors. To investigate this issue, we studied one of the Krox20hindbrain cis-regulatory sequences, element C, which is active in r3-r5 and which is the only initiator element in r3. We show that element C contains multiple binding sites for Meis and Hox/Pbx factors and that these proteins synergize to activate the enhancer. Mutation of these binding sites allowed us to establish that Krox20 is under the direct transcriptional control of both Meis (presumably Meis2) and Hox/Pbx factors in r3. Furthermore, our data indicate that element C functions according to multiple modes, in Meis-independent or -dependent manners and with different Hox proteins, in r3 and r5. Finally, we show that the Hoxb1 and Krox20expression domains transiently overlap in prospective r3, and that Hoxb1 binds to element C in vivo, supporting a cell-autonomous involvement of Hox paralogous group 1 proteins in Krox20 regulation. Altogether, our data clarify the molecular mechanisms of an essential step in hindbrain patterning. We propose a model for the complex regulation of Krox20,involving a novel mode of initiation, positive and negative controls by Hox proteins, and multiple direct and indirect autoregulatory loops.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Developmental Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference60 articles.
1. Barrow, J. R., Stadler, H. S. and Capecchi, M. R.(2000). Roles of Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in patterning the early hindbrain of the mouse. Development127,933-944. 2. Birgbauer, E. and Fraser, S. E. (1994). Violation of cell lineage restriction compartments in the chick hindbrain. Development120,1347-1356. 3. Carpenter, E. M., Goddard, J. M., Chisaka, O., Manley, N. R. and Capecchi, M. R. (1993). Loss of Hox-A1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. Development118,1063-1075. 4. Chavrier, P., Lemaire, P., Revelant, O., Bravo, R. and Charnay,P. (1988). Characterization of a mouse multigene family that encodes zinc finger structures. Mol. Cell. Biol.8,1319-1326. 5. Chavrier, P., Janssen-Timmen, U., Mattei, M. G., Zerial, M.,Bravo, R. and Charnay, P. (1989). Structure, chromosome location, and expression of the mouse zinc finger gene Krox-20: multiple gene products and coregulation with the proto-oncogene c-fos. Mol. Cell. Biol.9,787-797.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|