Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca,NY 14853, USA
Abstract
SUMMARY
The relationship between insect gut structure and foraging strategy has been studied for several hundred years; however, we know little about how, or even if, other common insect behaviors are linked to gut morphology. For example, many insects defend themselves by regurgitation, a behavior which is expected to be closely connected to gut structure. Caterpillars belong to an insect taxon, the Lepidoptera, with a particularly well-studied digestive tract and a known predilection for defensive regurgitation. I have explored whether defensive regurgitation is associated with specific gut structure by examining the relationship between defensive behavior and gut morphology in the larvae of 36 butterfly and moth species. My analysis shows that predilection to defensively regurgitate is closely associated with fore- and midgut morphology. Species that primarily regurgitate in defense have enlarged foreguts and shortened midguts, whereas the opposite relationship is seen among those that do not readily regurgitate. These results reveal that: (i)defensive regurgitation is not the primary defense of all caterpillars, and(ii) gut morphology can be associated with other factors than the chemical and mechanical properties of ingested foods. These findings challenge long held beliefs concerning the ubiquity of defensive regurgitation in caterpillars and the causes of diversification of gut morphology, and further reinforce the gut's standing as a complex and sophisticated organ.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference47 articles.
1. Anduaga, S. and Huerta, C. (2001). Effect of parental care on the duration of larval development and offspring survival in Nicrophorus mexicanus Matthews (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleopt. Bull.55,264-271.
2. Ayre, G. L. and Hitchon, D. E. (1968). Predation of tent caterpillars Malacosoma americana (Lepidoptera:Lasiocampidae) by ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Can. Entomol.100,823-826.
3. Blum, M. S. (1981). Chemical Defenses of Arthropods. New York: Academic Press.
4. Blum, M. S. (1992). Ingested allelochemicals in insect wonderland: a menu of remarkable functions. Am. Entomol.38,222-234.
5. Bowers, M. D. (1993). Aposematic caterpillars:life-styles of the warningly colored and unpalatable. In Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging (ed. N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey), pp.331-371.New York: Chapman & Hall.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献