Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195,USA
Abstract
SUMMARYDuring flapping flight, insect wings must withstand not only fluid-dynamic forces, but also inertial-elastic forces generated by the rapid acceleration and deceleration of their own mass. Estimates of overall aerodynamic and inertial forces vary widely, and the relative importance of these forces in determining passive wing deformations remains unknown. If aeroelastic interactions between a wing and the fluid-dynamic forces it generates are minor compared to the effects of wing inertia, models of insect flight that account for passive wing flexibility would be far simpler to develop. We used an experimental approach to examine the contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. We attached fresh Manduca wings to a motor and flapped them at a realistic wing-beat frequency and stroke amplitude. We compared wing bending in normal air versus helium (approx. 15% air density), in which the contribution of fluid-dynamic forces to wing deformations is significantly reduced. This 85% reduction in air density produced only slight changes in the pattern of Manduca wing deformations, suggesting that fluid-dynamic forces have a minimal effect on wing bending. We used a simplified finite element model of a wing to show that the differences observed between wings flapped in air versus helium are most likely due to fluid damping, rather than to aerodynamic forces. This suggests that damped finite element models of insect wings (with no fluid-dynamic forces included) may be able to predict overall patterns of wing deformation prior to calculations of aerodynamic force production, facilitating integrative models of insect flight.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference31 articles.
1. Batchelor, G. K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Combes, S. A. (2002). Wing flexibility and design for animal flight. PhD thesis, University of Washington.
3. Combes, S. A. and Daniel, T. L. (2001). Shape,flapping and flexion: wing and fin design for forward flight. J. Exp. Biol.204,2073-2085.
4. Combes, S. A. and Daniel, T. L. (2003a). Flexural stiffness in insect wings: I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. J. Exp. Biol.206,2979-2987.
5. Combes, S. A. and Daniel, T. L. (2003b). Flexural stiffness in insect wings: II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending. J. Exp. Biol.206,2989-2997.
Cited by
234 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献