Differential regulation of imprinting in the murine embryo and placenta by theDlk1-Dio3imprinting control region
Author:
Lin Shau-Ping12, Coan Phil1, da Rocha Simao Teixeira1, Seitz Herve3, Cavaille Jerome3, Teng Pi-Wen1, Takada Shuji1, Ferguson-Smith Anne C.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Anatomy Building, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK. 2. Institute of Biotechnology, College of Bioresources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan. 3. LBME-CNRS, UMR 5099, IFR, Toulouse, France.
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism controlling parental-origin-specific gene expression. Perturbing the parental origin of the distal portion of mouse chromosome 12 causes alterations in the dosage of imprinted genes resulting in embryonic lethality and developmental abnormalities of both embryo and placenta. A 1 Mb imprinted domain identified on distal chromosome 12 contains three paternally expressed protein-coding genes and multiple non-coding RNA genes, including snoRNAs and microRNAs,expressed from the maternally inherited chromosome. An intergenic,parental-origin-specific differentially methylated region, the IG-DMR, which is unmethylated on the maternally inherited chromosome, is necessary for the repression of the paternally expressed protein-coding genes and for activation of the maternally expressed non-coding RNAs: its absence causes the maternal chromosome to behave like the paternally inherited one. Here, we characterise the developmental consequences of this epigenotype switch and compare these with phenotypes associated with paternal uniparental disomy of mouse chromosome 12. The results show that the embryonic defects described for uniparental disomy embryos can be attributed to this one cluster of imprinted genes on distal chromosome 12 and that these defects alone, and not the mutant placenta, can cause prenatal lethality. In the placenta, the absence of the IG-DMR has no phenotypic consequence. Loss of repression of the protein-coding genes occurs but the non-coding RNAs are not repressed on the maternally inherited chromosome. This indicates that the mechanism of action of the IG-DMR is different in the embryo and the placenta and suggests that the epigenetic control of imprinting differs in these two lineages.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Developmental Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference62 articles.
1. Abdallah, B. M., Jensen, C. H., Gutierrez, G., Leslie, R. G.,Jensen, T. G. and Kassem, M. (2004). Regulation of human skeletal stem cells differentiation by Dlk1/Pref-1. J. Bone Miner. Res.19,841-852. 2. Barton, S. C., Surani, M. A. and Norris, M. L.(1984). Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development. Nature311,374-376. 3. Barton, S. C., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., Fundele, R. and Surani, M. A. (1991). Influence of paternally imprinted genes on development. Development113,679-687. 4. Bidwell, C. A., Kramer, L. N., Perkins, A. C., Hadfield, T. S.,Moody, D. E. and Cockett, N. E. (2004). Expression of PEG11 and PEG11AS transcripts in normal and callipyge sheep. BMC Biol.2,17. 5. Cavaille, J., Seitz, H., Paulsen, M., Ferguson-Smith, A. C. and Bachellerie, J. P. (2002). Identification of tandemly-repeated C/D snoRNA genes at the imprinted human 14q32 domain reminiscent of those at the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region. Hum. Mol. Genet.11,1527-1538.
Cited by
102 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|