Affiliation:
1. University of Washington, Departments of Anthropology and Orthopaedics, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA. pakramer@u.washington.edu
Abstract
Bipedality is the defining characteristic of Hominidae and, as such, an understanding of the adaptive significance and functional implications of bipedality is imperative to any study of human evolution. Hominid bipedality is, presumably, a solution to some problem for the early hominids, one that has much to do with energy expenditure. Until recently, however, little attention could be focused on the quantifiable energetic aspects of bipedality as a unique locomotor form within Primates because of the inability to measure empirically the energy expenditure of non-modern hominids. A recently published method provides a way of circumventing the empirical measurement dilemma by calculating energy expenditure directly from anatomical variables and movement profiles. Although the origins of bipedality remain clouded, two discernible forms of locomotor anatomy are present in the hominid fossil record: the australopithecine and modern configurations. The australopithecine form is best represented by AL 288–1, a partial skeleton of Australopithecus afarensis, and is characterized as having short legs and a wide pelvis. The modern form is represented by modern humans and has long legs and a narrow pelvis. Human walking is optimized to take advantage of the changing levels of potential and kinetic energy that occur as the body and limbs move through the stride cycle. Although this optimization minimizes energy expenditure, some energy is required to maintain motion. I quantify this energy by developing a dynamic model that uses kinematic equations to determine energy expenditure. By representing both configurations with such a model, I can compare their rates of energy expenditure. I find that the australopithecine configuration uses less energy than that of a modern human. Despite arguments presented in the anthropological literature, the shortness of the legs of AL 288-1 provides no evidence that she was burdened with a compromised or transitional locomotor anatomy. Instead, she may well have been an effective biped at walking speeds, not despite her short legs, but rather because of them.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference21 articles.
1. Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion, two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure;Cavagna;Am.J.Physiol,1977
2. The relationship between length of stride, step frequency, time of swing and speed of walking for children and adults;Grieve;Ergonom,1966
3. Morphology of the Pliocene partial hominid skeleton (AL 288–1) from the Hadar formation, Ethiopia;Johanson;Am.J.Phys.Anthropol,1982
4. Lucy's limbs, skeletal allometry and locomotion in Australopithecus afarensis;Jungers;Nature,1982
5. The calcaneous of Australopithecus afarensis and its implications for the evolution of bipedality;Latimer;Am.J.Phys.Anthropol,1989
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献