Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
2. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,Haifa 32000, Israel
Abstract
SUMMARYCormorants are water birds that forage by submerged swimming in search and pursuit of fish. Underwater they swim by paddling with both feet simultaneously in a gait that includes long glides between consecutive strokes. At shallow swimming depths the birds are highly buoyant as a consequence of their aerial lifestyle. To counter this buoyancy cormorants swim underwater with their body at an angle to the swimming direction. This mechanical solution for foraging at shallow depth is expected to increase the cost of swimming by increasing the drag of the birds. We used kinematic analysis of video sequences of cormorants swimming underwater at shallow depth in a controlled research setup to analyze the swimming gait and estimate the resultant drag of the birds during the entire paddling cycle. The gliding drag of the birds was estimated from swimming speed deceleration during the glide stage while the drag during active paddling was estimated using a mathematical`burst-and-glide' model. The model was originally developed to estimate the energetic saving from combining glides with burst swimming and we used this fact to test whether the paddling gait of cormorants has similar advantages.We found that swimming speed was correlated with paddling frequency(r=0.56, P<0.001, N=95) where the increase in paddling frequency was achieved mainly by shortening the glide stage(r=–0.86, P<0.001, N=95). The drag coefficient of the birds during paddling was higher on average by two- to threefold than during gliding. However, the magnitude of the drag coefficient during the glide was positively correlated with the tilt of the body(r=0.5, P<0.003, N=35) and negatively correlated with swimming speed (r=–0.65, P<0.001, N=35), while the drag coefficient during the stroke was not correlated with tilt of the body (r=–0.11, P>0.5, N=35) and was positively correlated with swimming speed(r=0.41, P<0.015, N=35). Therefore, the difference between the drag coefficient during the glide and during propulsion diminished at lower speeds and larger tilt. The mean drag of the birds for a single paddling cycle at an average swimming speed of 1.5 m s–1 was 5.5±0.68 N. The burst-and-glide model predicts that energy saving from using burst-and-glide in the paddling cycle is limited to relatively fast swimming speeds (>1.5 m s–1), but that as the birds dive deeper (>1 m where buoyancy is reduced), the burst-and-glide gait may become beneficial even at lower speeds.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference52 articles.
1. Alexander, R. M. (1968). Animal Mechanics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
2. Ancel, A., Starke, L. N., Ponganis, P. J., Van Dam, R. and Kooyman, G. L. (2000). Energetics of surface swimming in Brandt's cormorants (Phalacrocorax pencillatus brandt). J. Exp. Biol.203,3727-3731.
3. Bilo, D. and Nachtigall, W. (1980). A simple method to determine drag coefficients in aquatic animals. J. Exp. Biol.87,357-359.
4. Clark, B. D. and Bemis, W. (1979). Kinematics of swimming of penguins at the Detroit Zoo. J. Zool. Lond.188,411-428.
5. Denny, M. W. (1993). Air and Water. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献