Oskar allows nanos mRNA translation in Drosophilaembryos by preventing its deadenylation by Smaug/CCR4
Author:
Zaessinger Sophie1, Busseau Isabelle1, Simonelig Martine1
Affiliation:
1. Génétique du Développement de la Drosophile,Institut de Génétique Humaine, CNRS UPR 1142, 141 rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Abstract
Anteroposterior patterning of the Drosophila embryo depends on a gradient of Nanos protein arising from the posterior pole. This gradient results from both nanos mRNA translational repression in the bulk of the embryo and translational activation of nanos mRNA localized at the posterior pole. Two mechanisms of nanos translational repression have been described, at the initiation step and after this step. Here we identify a novel level of nanos translational control. We show that the Smaug protein bound to the nanos 3′ UTR recruits the deadenylation complex CCR4-NOT, leading to rapid deadenylation and subsequent decay of nanos mRNA. Inhibition of deadenylation causes stabilization of nanos mRNA, ectopic synthesis of Nanos protein and head defects. Therefore, deadenylation is essential for both translational repression and decay of nanos mRNA. We further propose a mechanism for translational activation at the posterior pole. Translation of nanos mRNA at the posterior pole depends on oskar function. We show that Oskar prevents the rapid deadenylation of nanos mRNA by precluding its binding to Smaug, thus leading to its stabilization and translation. This study provides insights into molecular mechanisms of regulated deadenylation by specific proteins and demonstrates its importance in development.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Developmental Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference55 articles.
1. Aviv, T., Lin, Z., Lau, S., Rendl, L. M., Sicheri, F. and Smibert, C. A. (2003). The RNA-binding SAM domain of Smaug defines a new family of post-transcriptional regulators. Nat. Struct. Biol.10,614-621. 2. Bashirullah, A., Halsell, S. R., Cooperstock, R. L., Kloc, M.,Karaiskakis, A., Fisher, W. W., Fu, W., Hamilton, J. K., Etkin, L. D. and Lipshitz, H. D. (1999). Joint action of two RNA degradation pathways controls the timing of maternal transcript elimination at the midblastula transition in Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J.18,2610-2620. 3. Benoit, B., Nemeth, A., Aulner, N., Kühn, U., Simonelig,M., Wahle, E. and Bourbon, H. M. (1999). The Drosophila poly(A)-binding protein II is ubiquitous throughout Drosophila development and has the same function in mRNA polyadenylation as its bovine homolog in vitro.Nucleic Acids Res.27,3771-3778. 4. Benoit, B., Juge, F., Iral, F., Audibert, A. and Simonelig,M. (2002). Chimeric human CstF-77/DrosophilaSuppressor of forked proteins rescue suppressor of forked mutant lethality and mRNA 3′-end processing in Drosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99,10593-10598. 5. Benoit, B., Mitou, G., Chartier, A., Temme, C., Zaessinger, S.,Wahle, E., Busseau, I. and Simonelig, M. (2005). An essential cytoplasmic function for the nuclear poly(A) binding protein, PABP2, in poly(A) tail length control and early development in Drosophila. Dev. Cell9,511-522.
Cited by
168 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|