Response properties of electrosensory afferent fibers and secondary brain stem neurons in the paddlefish
Author:
Hofmann Michael H.1, Chagnaud Boris1, Wilkens Lon A.2
Affiliation:
1. University of Bonn, Institute of Zoology, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany 2. Center for Neurodynamics, Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St Louis, MO 63121, USA
Abstract
SUMMARY
The passive electrosense is used by many aquatic animals to detect weak electric fields from other animals or from geoelectric sources. In contrast to the active electrosense, `passive' means that there are no electric organs,and only external fields are measured. Electroreceptors are distributed in the skin, but are different from other skin senses because they can detect and localize sources a considerable distance away. Distant sources, however,stimulate a large number of receptors at the same time and central circuits have to compute the exact location of the source from this distributed information. In order to gain insights into the algorithms involved, we compared the response properties of units in the dorsal octavolateral nucleus(DON) with primary afferent fibers in the paddlefish. The following parameters were tested: spontaneous activity, sensitivity, frequency tuning, receptive field size, movement sensitivity, and topography within the DON. Although there are some differences in spontaneous activity and receptive field size,there are no major differences between primary afferents and DON units that could reveal any substantial amount of spatial information processing. In particular the lack of any topographic order whithin the DON renders a lateral interaction between neighboring receptive fields unlikely.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference42 articles.
1. Andrianov, G. N., Bretschneider, F. and Peters, R. C.(1996). Mode of operation of ampullary electroreceptor organs of freshwater catfish. Prim. Sensory Neuron1, 231-242. 2. Bahar, S., Kantelhardt, J. W., Neimann, A., Rego, H. H. A.,Russell, D. F., Wilkens, L., Bunde, A. and Moss, F. (2001). Long-range temporal anti-correlations in paddlefish electroreceptors. Europhys. Lett56,454-460. 3. Bodznick, D. and Boord, R. L. (1986). Electroreception in chondrichthyes. Central anatomy and physiology. In Electroreception (ed. T. H. Bullock and W. Heiligenberg), pp. 225-256. New York: John Wiley& Sons. 4. Bodznick, D. and Northcutt, R. G. (1981). Electroreception in lampreys: evidence that the earliest vertebrates were electroreceptive. Science221,465-467. 5. Bodznick, D. and Schmidt, A. (1984). Somatotopy within the medullary electrosensory nucleus of the little skate, Raja erinacea.J. Comp. Neurol.225,581-590.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|