Tests of absolute photorefractoriness in four species of cardueline finch that differ in reproductive schedule
Author:
MacDougall-Shackleton Scott A.1, Katti Madhusudan2, Hahn Thomas P.3
Affiliation:
1. Departments of Psychology and Biology, University of Western Ontario,London ON, N6A 5C2, Canada 2. Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, USA 3. Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Animal Communication Laboratory, University of California, Davis, USA
Abstract
SUMMARYSpecies with different reproductive schedules may differ in how they respond to the annual change in photoperiod (the adaptive specialization hypothesis). Seasonally breeding species are predicted to use photorefractoriness to terminate reproduction prior to inclement conditions in autumn and winter, whereas opportunistically breeding species may not exhibit photorefractoriness. We tested for absolute photorefractoriness in four species of cardueline finch that differ in their reproductive schedules:opportunistically breeding red crossbills, flexibly breeding pine siskins, and seasonally breeding Cassin's finches and gray-crowned rosy-finches. Field observations indicated that all four species regress their gonads and begin prebasic feather molt in late summer or autumn. However, exposure to a long day photoperiod in autumn (24 h:0 h L:D) resulted in elevation of gonadotropins and testicular recrudescence in all species except Cassin's finches. Thus, by this criterion, some of the seasonally breeding species tested here did not exhibit absolute photorefractoriness. These results indicate that phylogenetic history needs to be taken into account when considering the adaptive nature of photoperiod response systems.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Adkisson, C. S. (1996). Red crossbill(Loxia curvirostra), No. 256. In The Birds of North America (ed. A. Poole and F. Gill). Philadelphia, Washington DC:The Academy of Natural Sciences and the American Ornithologists'Union. 2. Arnaiz-Villena, A., Guillen, J., Ruiz-del-Valle, V., Lowy, E.,Zamora, J., Varela, P., Stefani, D. and Allende, L. M.(2001). Phylogeography of crossbills, bullfinches, grosbeaks, and rosefinches. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58,1159-1166. 3. Badyaev, A. V. (1997). Avian life history variation along altitudinal gradients: an example with cardueline finches. Oecologia111,365-374. 4. Baker, J. R. (1938). The evolution of breeding seasons. In Evolution: Essays on Aspects of Evolutionary Biology (ed. G. B. DeBeer), pp. 161-177. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 5. Ball, G. F. and Hahn, T. P. (1997). GnRH neuronal systems in birds and their relation to the control of seasonal reproduction. In GnRH Neurons: Gene to Behavior (ed. I. S. Parhar and Y. Sakuma), pp. 325-342. Tokyo:Brain, Shuppan.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|