α1β1-integrin engagement to distinct laminin-1 domains orchestrates spreading, migration and survival of neural crest cells through independent signaling pathways
Author:
Desban Nathalie1, Lissitzky Jean-Claude2, Rousselle Patricia3, Duband Jean-Loup1
Affiliation:
1. Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, CNRS et Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 9 quai Saint-Bernard, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France 2. Unité Mixte de Recherche 6032, CNRS et Université de la Méditerranée, Facultés de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Marseille, France 3. IFR 128 BiosSciences Lyon-Gerland, Institut de Biologie et Chimie des Protéines, CNRS et Université Lyon-1, Lyon, France
Abstract
Integrin engagement regulates cell adhesion, shape, migration, growth, and differentiation, but molecular mechanisms coordinating these functions in cells remain unclear. Because of their migratory and differentiation potential, neural crest cells constitute a powerful paradigm to address this question. Here, we describe that laminin-1, a major component of their migration routes, promotes crest cell spreading, migration and survival through two distinct integrin-binding domains that are situated on both sides of its α1 subunit and can be separated in the LN-1 elastase proteolytic fragments E1' and E8. Interaction with either domain was mediated by the same integrin α1β1 but produced distinct, complementary responses through specific signaling cascades. FAK activation upon E8 binding induced spreading, formation of actin bundles and focal adhesions, stimulated oriented migration, but failed to support survival. Conversely, Erk activation upon E1' binding promoted long-term survival and random migration without actin reorganization. Consistent with this, interaction with laminin-5 or laminin-10/11, which do not harbor integrin-binding domains in the N-terminal side of their α chains, failed to support survival. Thus, the signaling activity and function of integrins might depend on binding domains in their ligands, thereby revealing ligand control of integrin function as a possible mechanism for the modulation and coordination of cell response to adhesive signals.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Reference63 articles.
1. Aberdam, D., Aguzzi, A., Baudouin, C., Galliano, M.-F., Ortonne, J.-P. and Meneguzzi, G. (1994). Developmental expression of nicein adhesion protein (laminin-5) subunits suggests multiple morphogenetic roles. Cell Adhes. Commun.2, 115-129. 2. Bökel, C. and Brown, N. H. (2002). Integrins in development: moving on, responding to, and sticking to the extracellular matrix. Dev. Cell3, 311-321. 3. Boucaut, J.-C., Darribère, T., Poole, T. J., Aoyama, H., Yamada, K. M. and Thiery, J. P. (1984). Biological active synthetic peptides as probes of embryonic development: a competitive peptide inhibitor of fibronectin function inhibits gastrulation in amphibian embryos and neural crest cell migration in avian embryos. J. Cell Biol.99, 1822-1830. 4. Breau, M. A., Pietri, T., Eder, O., Blanche, M., Brakebusch, C., Fässler, R., Thiery, J. P. and Dufour, S. (2006). Lack of β1 integrins in enteric neural crest cells leads to a Hirschsprung-like phenotype. Development133, 1725-1734. 5. Bronner-Fraser, M. (1986). An antibody to a receptor for fibronectin and laminin perturbs cranial neural crest development in vivo. Dev. Biol.117, 528-536.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|