Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USA
Abstract
SUMMARYSand vipers of the genus Cerastes are specialized semi-fossorial snakes that launch predatory strikes at rodents and lizards while partially buried in the soft sand of the Saharan desert. This study attempted to document which environmental stimuli are used by these snakes as a trigger for the ambush behavior. Denervating the olfactory and vomeronasal organs produced no changes in prey capture behavior in Cerastes cerastes. Occluding the eyes of the denervated specimens resulted in significant decreases in strike distance, diversity of strike angle and strike accuracy, demonstrating the importance of visual stimuli for target acquisition in this species. Nevertheless, every olfactory-denervated, temporarily blinded specimen succeeded in capturing free-ranging mice in every trial. Presentation of chemosensory-neutral targets to the olfactory-denervated, temporarily blinded specimens resulted in similar predatory behaviors, whether the target was isothermic to the environment or heated to mammalian body temperature. Collectively, these results provide evidence for the importance of visual stimuli during foraging in C. cerastes, the first experimental evidence for foraging by vibration detection in snakes and the strongest evidence to date that snakes are capable of ‘hearing’ vibrational stimuli.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference22 articles.
1. Austin, J. D. and Gregory, P. T. (1998). Relative roles of thermal and chemical cues in the investigative behavior of prey in colubrid (Elaphe guttata and Lampropeltis getulus) and boid (Python regius) snakes. Herpetol. Nat. Hist.6, 47–50.
2. Bonnet, X., Bradshaw, D., Shine, R. and Pearson, D. (1999). Why do snakes have eyes? The (non-)effect of blindness in island tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.46, 267–272.
3. Chiszar, D., Walters, A., Urbaniak, J., Smith, H. M. and Mackessy, S. P. (1999). Discrimination between envenomated and nonenvenomated prey by western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox): chemosensory consequences of venom. Copeia1999, 640–648.
4. Dickman, D. J., Colton, J. S., Chiszar, D. and Colton, C. A. (1987). Trigeminal responses to thermal stimulation of the oral cavity in rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) before and after bilateral anesthetisation of the facial pit organ. Brain Res.400, 365–370.
5. Ford, N. B. and Burghardt, G. M. (1993). Perceptual mechanisms and the behavioral ecology of snakes. In Snakes: Ecology and Behavior (ed. R. A. Seigel and J. T. Collins), pp. 117–164. New York: McGraw Hill.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献