Affiliation:
1. Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853,USA
Abstract
SUMMARY
The elevation of objects in the visual field has long been recognized as a potential distance cue, but it has been demonstrated to a reasonable extent in only four species: humans, frogs, fiddler crabs and backswimmers. Many tiger beetles hunt in flat, sandy areas, and their eyes show `flat-world'adaptations, such as an extended visual streak of higher acuity that corresponds to the horizon. They are therefore possible candidates for the use of elevation as a cue for distance. We tested this empirically and with simulation. In a behavioral prey selection paradigm, in which starved beetles were presented moving prey-targets having different size, speed and elevation,the beetles showed a strong preference for large targets when these were low in the visual field and a weaker preference for small targets when these were near the horizon. Striking of targets above the horizon was reduced compared to sub-horizontal targets, and lacked the size-elevation interaction. We simulated these empirical results with a model that converted elevation to distance, and used distance to estimate the absolute size of the targets. Simulated strike probability was then determined by the similarity between this absolute size and an independently confirmed preferred prey size. The results of the simulation model matched the empirical data as well as the best statistical model of the behavioral results. While some aspects of the model,and the beetles' behavior, differ from the strict geometry of the `elevation hypothesis', our results nevertheless indicate that tiger beetles use elevation to estimate distance to prey, and that it is therefore one of the determinants of prey selection.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference48 articles.
1. Collett, T. S. (1978). Peering: a locust behavior pattern for obtaining motion parallax information.J. Exp. Biol.76,237-241.
2. Collett, T. S. and Land, M. F. (1978). How hoverflies compute interception courses. J. Comp. Physiol. A125,191-204.
3. Collett, T. S. and Udin, S. B. (1988). Frogs use retinal elevation as a cue to distance. J. Comp. Physiol. A163,677-683.
4. Curd, M. and Cover, J. A. (ed.) (1998). Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. New York:W. W. Norton.
5. Day, R. H. (1972). Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation. Science175,1335-1340.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献