Affiliation:
1. Research Centre for Animal Cognition, CNRS–University Paul-Sabatier(UMR 5169), 31062 Toulouse cedex 09, France
Abstract
SUMMARY
In Pavlovian conditioning, an originally neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus or CS) gains control over an animal's reflex after its association with a biologically relevant stimulus (unconditioned stimulus or US). As a consequence, a conditioned response is emitted by the animal upon further CS presentations. In such a situation, the subject exhibits a reflex response, so that whether the CS thereby acquires a positive or a negative value for the animal is difficult to assess. In honeybees, Apis mellifera, an odour(CS) can be associated either with sucrose solution (US) in the appetitive conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER), or with an electric shock (US) in the aversive conditioning of the sting extension reflex (SER). The term `aversive' may not apply to the latter as bees do not suppress SER as a consequence of learning but, on the contrary, start emitting SER to the CS. To determine whether the CS acquires a positive or a negative value in these conditioning forms, we compared the orientation behaviour of freely walking honeybees in an olfactory-cued Y-maze after training them with an odour–sucrose association (PER conditioning) or an odour–shock association (SER conditioning). We show that the same odours can acquire either a positive value when associated to sucrose, or a negative value when associated to an electric shock, as bees respectively approach or avoid the CS in the Y-maze. Importantly, these results clearly establish the aversive nature of SER conditioning in honeybees.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference44 articles.
1. Arenas, A., Fernandez, V. M. and Farina, W. M.(2007). Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees'foraging decisions. Naturwissenschaften94,218-222.
2. Bakchine-Huber, E., Pham-Delègue, M. H., Patte, F. and Masson, C. (1992). Modification d'une préférence olfactive après apprentissage chez l'abeille:influence de la nature du signal appris. C. R. Acad. Sci. III314,325-330.
3. Balderrama, N., Núñez, J., Guerrieri, F. and Giurfa, M. (2002). Different functions of two alarm substances in the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. A188,485-491.
4. Bitterman, M. E., Menzel, R., Fietz, A. and Schäfer, S.(1983). Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Psychol.97,107-119.
5. Breed, M. D., Guzman-Novoa, E. and Hunt, G. J.(2004). Defensive behavior of honey bees: organization, genetics,and comparison with other bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol.49,271-298.
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献