Affiliation:
1. Free University of Berlin, Department of Biology/Chemistry/Pharmacy,Institute of Biology – Neurobiology, Koenigin-Luise-Straße 28/30,14195 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
SUMMARY
In this study, we asked whether honeybees learn the sign and magnitude of variations in the level of reward. We designed an experiment in which bees first had to forage on a three-flower patch offering variable reward levels,and then search for food at the site in the absence of reward and after a long foraging pause. At the time of training, we presented the bees with a decrease in reward level or, instead, with either a small or a large increase in reward level. Testing took place as soon as they visited the patch on the day following training, when we measured the bees' food-searching behaviours. We found that the bees that had experienced increasing reward levels searched for food more persistently than the bees that had experienced decreasing reward levels, and that the bees that had experienced a large increase in reward level searched for food more persistently than the bees that had experienced a small increase in reward level. Because these differences at the time of testing cannot be accounted for by the bees' previous crop loads and food-intake rates, our results unambiguously demonstrate that honeybees adjust their investment of time/energy during foraging in relation to both the sign and the magnitude of past variations in the level of reward. It is likely that such variations lead to the formation of reward expectations enhancing a forager's reliance on a feeding site. Ultimately, this would make it more likely for honeybees to find food when forage is scarce.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Baker, H. G. and Baker, I. (1983). A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In The Biology of Nectaries (ed. B. Bentley and T. Elias), pp.126-152. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Bitterman, M. E. (1996). Comparative analysis of learning in honeybees. Anim. Learn. Behav.24,123-141.
3. Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol.9, 129-136.
4. Crespi, L. P. (1942). Quantitative variation in incentive and performance in the white rat. Am. J. Psychol.40,467-517.
5. De Marco, R. J. and Farina, W. M. (2001). Changes in food source profitability affect the trophallactic and dance behavior of forager honeybees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.50,441-449.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献