Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Sciences, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, NY 10027, USA
Abstract
SUMMARYWhen animals repeatedly sample a noxious food over a period of 1–4 days, they can markedly reduce their aversive behavioral response to the diet’s unpleasant taste (e.g. ‘bitterness’) or toxic effects. This long-term adaptation process is selective, however, permitting insects to adapt physiologically to some but not all noxious foods. We hypothesized (i) that the selective nature of this adaptation process stems from the fact that some unpalatable foods are toxic while others are harmless and (ii) that insects have more difficulty adapting to foods that are both unpalatable and toxic. Our model system consisted of Manduca sexta caterpillars and two compounds that taste bitter to humans and elicit an aversive behavioral response in this insect (salicin and aristolochic acid). We found that 2 days of exposure to a salicin diet completely adapted the aversive response of the caterpillars to salicin, but that exposure to an aristolochic acid diet failed to adapt the aversive response to aristolochic acid. We determined that M. sexta could not adapt to the aristolochic acid diet because it lacked mechanisms for reducing the compound’s toxicity. In contrast, the salicin diet did not produce any apparent toxic effects, and the caterpillars adapted to its aversive taste within 12 h of exposure. We also found that the salicin adaptation phenomenon (i) was mediated by the central gustatory system, (ii) generalized to salicin concentrations that were twice those in the adapting diet and (iii) offset spontaneously when the caterpillar was transferred to a salicin-free diet. We propose that toxicity is a more significant barrier to dietary adaptation than ‘bitterness’ in this insect.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference42 articles.
1. Altman, J. S. and Kien, J. (1987). Functional organization of the subesophageal ganglion in arthropods. In Arthropod Brain: its Evolution, Development, Structure and Functions (ed. A. P. Gupta), pp. 265–301. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Bell, R. A. and Joachim, F. A. (1976). Techniques for rearing laboratory colonies of tobacco hornworms and pink bollworms. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am.69, 365–373.
3. Bernays, E. A. and Chapman, R. F. (1987). The evolution of deterrent responses in plant-feeding insects. In Perspectives in Chemoreception and Behavior (ed. R. F. Chapman E. A. Bernays and J. G. Stoffolano, Jr), pp. 159–173. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Blaney, W. M., Schoonhoven, L. M. and Simmonds, M. S. J. (1986). Sensitivity variations in insect chemoreceptors; a review. Experientia42, 13–19.
5. Blaney, W. M. and Simmonds, M. S. J. (1987). Experience: a modifier of neural and behavioural sensitivity. In Insects–Plants (ed. V. Labeyrie G. Fabres and D. Lachaise), pp. 237–241. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Dr W. Junk Publishers.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献