Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
2. Present address: Pharmacia, Chesterfield, MO 63017, USA
3. Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Abstract
The three Drosophila EcR isoforms differ only at their N termini;thus, they share the conserved ligand-binding domain transcriptional activation function (AF2) and only differ in the unconserved A/B region, which contains a second, isoform-specific, activation function (AF1). We have developed a dominant-negative mutant EcR (EcR-DN), expressed it in flies with the GAL4/UAS system, and used it to block ecdysone signaling in eight tissues or groups of tissues. Localized EcR-DN arrests ecdysone-dependent development in the target cells and often — because of a molting checkpoint —arrests development globally. Simultaneously expressing individual wild-type EcR isoforms in the same target tissues suppresses the EcR-DN phenotype and identifies the rescuing isoform as sufficient to support the development of the target. Every isoform, and even an N-terminal truncated EcR that lacks any AF1, supports development in the fat body, eye discs, salivary glands,EH-secreting neurosecretory cells and in the dpp expression domain,implying that AF1 is dispensable in these tissues. By contrast, only EcR-A is able to support development in the margins of the wing discs, and only EcR-B2 can do so in the larval epidermis and the border cells of the developing egg chamber. In light of our results, the simplest explanations for the widespread spatial and temporal variations in EcR isoform titers appear untenable.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Developmental Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference92 articles.
1. Andres, A. J. and Cherbas, P. (1992). Tissue-specific ecdysone responses: regulation of the Drosophila genes Eip28-29 and Eip40 during larval development.Development116,865-876.
2. Andres, A. J. and Cherbas, P. (1994). Tissue-specific regulation by ecdysone: Distinct patterns of Eip28/29 expression are controlled by different ecdysone response elements.Dev. Genet.15,320-331.
3. Andres, A. J. Fletcher, J. C., Karim, F. D. and Thummel, C. S. (1993). Molecular analysis of the initiation of insect metamorphosis: a comparative study of Drosophilaecdysteroid-regulated transcription. Dev. Biol.160,388-404.
4. Ashburner, M. (1967). Patterns of puffing activity in the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila.Chromosoma21,398-428.
5. Ashburner, M. (1973). Sequential gene activation by ecdysone in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Dependence upon ecdysone concentration. Dev. Biol.35,47-61.