Relationship between stylolite morphology and the sealing potential of stylolite-bearing carbonate cap rocks

Author:

Wu Jun123,Fan Tailiang12,Gomez-Rivas Enrique3,Cao Qian4,Travé Anna3,Gao Zhiqian12,Kang Zhihong1,Koehn Daniel5,Bons Paul D.67

Affiliation:

1. 1School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

2. 2Key Laboratory of Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Enrichment Mechanism, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100083, China

3. 3Department of Mineralogy, Petrology and Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona 08028, Spain

4. 4Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an 710018, China

5. 5Friedrich Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen Nüremberg, Geozentrum Nordbayern, Schlossgarten 5, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

6. 6Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstrasse 56, 72074 Tübingen, Germany

7. 7School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Abstract

Abstract We analyzed the sealing effectiveness of cap rocks bearing different types of stylolites using a combination of petrographic, petrophysical, pore structure, and sealing capacity characterization techniques. This study was based on examples of carbonate cap rocks that seal ultradeep hydrocarbon reservoirs of the Tarim Basin (China). Samples from both drill cores and their outcrop analogues were investigated to quantify how morphology influences the sealing capacity of different types of stylolite-bearing rocks. The study cap rocks consisted of mudstone, wackestone to packstone, grainstone, and dolomitic limestone. Four types of stylolites were identified: rectangular layer, seismogram pinning, suture and sharp peak, and simple wave-like types. The difference in the sealing capacity of carbonate cap rocks is attributed to their pore structure connections and the types of stylolites they develop. Samples bearing simple wave-like stylolites showed the best sealing capacity, followed by those with rectangular layer and suture and sharp peak types, whereas carbonates hosting seismogram pinning types had the lowest sealing capacity. The impact of stylolite segments on the rock sealing properties, however, differed from one segment to another. Rectangular layer–type stylolites could be divided into three distinct segments (with good, moderate, and poor sealing, respectively). Both the seismogram pinning and suture and sharp peak stylolite types were divided in two parts, with the former one having moderate and poor sealing and the latter exhibiting good and moderate sealing. The simple wavelike type had a good sealing capacity all along the pressure-solution seam. The most effective sealing barriers for vertical fluid flow form when (1) calcite and siliceous cements are pervasively distributed in the vicinity of stylolites, forming highly cemented zones with lower porosity and permeability than their surrounding host rocks; (2) stylolites are enriched in insoluble residues; and (3) rare microfractures and dissolution vugs are found along the stylolites. This work provides useful examples for the prediction of the sealing potential of stylolite-bearing carbonate rocks according to stylolite morphology in other geologic settings.

Publisher

Geological Society of America

Subject

Geology

Reference100 articles.

1. Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships: Discussion;Aguilera;American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2006

2. Stylolites in Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs, UAE;Alsharhan,2000

3. Bedding-parallel stylolites as a tool to unravel maximum burial depth in sedimentary basins: Application to Middle Jurassic carbonate reservoirs in the Paris Basin, France;Beaudoin;Geological Society of America Bulletin,2019

4. Facies analysis, diagenesis and sequence stratigraphy of the carbonate-evaporite succession of the Upper Jurassic Surmeh Formation: Impacts on reservoir quality (Salman oil field, Persian Gulf, Iran);Beigi;Journal of African Earth Sciences,2017

5. Porosity gain and loss in unconventional reservoirs: Example of rock typing in Lower Cretaceous hemipelagic limestones, SE France (Provence);Bruna;Marine and Petroleum Geology,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3