Interpreting and reporting fission-track chronological data

Author:

Kohn Barry P.1ORCID,Ketcham Richard A.2,Vermeesch Pieter3,Boone Samuel C.14,Hasebe Noriko5,Chew David6,Bernet Matthias7,Chung Ling1,Danišík Martin8,Gleadow Andrew J.W.1,Sobel Edward R.9

Affiliation:

1. 1School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

2. 2Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

3. 3Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

4. 4Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia

5. 5Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan

6. 6Department of Geology, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

7. 7Institut de Science de la Terre, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38058 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France

8. 8John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia

9. 9Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam 14476, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Fission-track dating is based on the analysis of tracks—linear damage trails—produced by the spontaneous fission of 238U in a range of natural accessory minerals and glasses. The retention of tracks is sensitive to elevated temperatures, and the data serve principally as a tool for recording thermal histories of rocks, potentially over the range of ~20–350 °C, depending on the specific minerals studied. As such, in most cases, fission-track data generally bear little or no direct relationship to the original formation age of the material studied. The age range of fission-track dating is related to the product of age and uranium content, and ages from several tens of years to older than 1 Ga are reported. Fission-track analysis led to the development of powerful modeling techniques. When used with appropriate geological constraints, these modeling techniques allow important geological processes to be addressed in a broad range of upper crustal settings. Since early attempts to standardize the treatment of fission-track data and system calibration over more than 30 years ago, major advancements were made in the methodology, necessitating the development of new, updated data reporting requirements. Inconsistencies in reporting impede public data transparency, accessibility and reuse, Big Data regional syntheses, and interlaboratory analytical comparisons. This paper briefly reviews the fundamentals of fission-track dating and applications to provide context for recommended guidelines for reporting and supporting essential meta fission-track data for publication and methodological archiving in structured formats that conform with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles. Adopting such practices will ensure that data can be readily accessed, interrogated, and reused, allowing for further integration with other numerical geoscience techniques.

Publisher

Geological Society of America

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3