Exploring the Assessment Experiences of Eight Teenage Maltese Boys

Author:

Said Pace Doreen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ministry For Education, Sports, Youth, Research, and Innovation, Malta

Abstract

Teaching, learning, and assessment are not silos. Instead, they are the pillars that should be connected by meaningful assessment practices for effective educational gains. Assessment can be meaningful to its users—educators and students—only if they can make sense of what, and why, they are employing certain strategies and techniques. In the intent to contribute to this lacuna, eight 12-year-old male voices attending the same non-state school were captured. A narrative methodological approach has been adopted to provide an enriched understanding of the learners' life experiences of their educational assessment. Virtual interviews were the source of data collection. Findings show different degrees of understanding—narrow, moderate, and broad—and a relationship with the preferred modalities of assessment. Despite the lack of uniformity in the formative assessment (FA) practices adopted by their educators, all the boys see benefits in the use of FA strategies, yet assessment is regarded as a teacher thing rather than a shared partnership between them.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference60 articles.

1. Alvi, M. (2016). A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/70218/1/MPRA_paper_70218.pdf

2. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation.

3. Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning;H. L.Andrade;Handbook of formative assessment,2010

4. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Author.

5. BittnerI.JohnsonT. (2002). Improving Instruction Through Observation and Feedback. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://search.alexanderstreet.com/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cvideo_work%7C3291834

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3