Expectations vs. Practice in Critical Infrastructure Operator Crisis Communication

Author:

Petersen Laura1ORCID,Fallou Laure2,Reilly Paul3ORCID,Serafinelli Elisa3

Affiliation:

1. International Union of Railways (UIC), France

2. Euro-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), France

3. University of Sheffield, UK

Abstract

Previous research into social media in crisis communication has tended to focus on use by emergency managers rather than another key stakeholder, critical infrastructure (CI) operators. This chapter adds to this field by empirically investigating public expectations of information provided by CI operators during crisis situations. It does so by drawing on a review of the literature on public expectations of disaster-related information shared via social media. Then it presents the results of an online questionnaire and interview-based study of disaster-vulnerable communities in France, Norway, Portugal, and Sweden. Results indicate that members of the public expect CI operators to provide information via traditional and social media, but not necessarily respond to queries on social media. Operators appear to meet traditional media expectations but should expand their current practices to include digital media.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference51 articles.

1. Artman, H., Brynielsson, J., Johansson, B. J. E., & Trnka, J. (2011). Dialogical emergency management and strategic awareness in emergency communication. Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference, 1–9. http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:479686/FULLTEXT01.pdf

2. New Focus for Weathering Storms: Customer Resilience;B.Barker;EPRI Journal,2013

3. BinghamN.ValentineG.HollowayS. (1999). On the sociality of young peoples’ use of the Internet. Internet–Based Teaching and Learning. IN–TELE.

4. BoulanH. (2015). Le questionnaire d’enquête: Les clés d’une étude marketing ou d’opinion réussi. Dunot.

5. BrunsA.BurgessJ.CrawfordK.ShawF. (2012). # qldfloods and @ QPSMedia : Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods. ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3