Developing a Rubric to Evaluate the Dissertations Conducted in the Fields of Educational and Social Sciences

Author:

Açıkgöz Ömer1,Aslan Aydın2,Koçak Korkut3,Günay Aslı1,Yavuz Nevzat4

Affiliation:

1. Social Sciences University of Ankara, Turkey

2. Selcuk University, Turkey

3. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Education, Turkey

4. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye, Turkey

Abstract

This study aims to develop a rubric to evaluate the dissertations implemented in the fields of educational and social sciences. In the development of this rubric, the acquisition requirements concerning knowledge, skills, and competence at the doctorate level in the European and Turkish qualifications frameworks, the legal framework of Turkish higher education, and the perceptions of 12 experts in the fields of educational and social sciences concerning the common competences of the dissertations were considered. The rubric can contribute to the evaluation of dissertations completed in the field of educational and social sciences concerning these dimensions and provide PhD students, researchers, and academics with a guide to evaluate their academic studies based on an empirical instrument.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference27 articles.

1. Agu, N. N., Omenyi, A. S., & O, C. (2015). Evaluation of doctorate dissertation in Nigerian Universities: do faculties provide and use criteria / rubrics? International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education (IJTIE),4(1), 565-569.

2. Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

3. Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio

4. EQF. (2005). Descriptors defining levels in the European Qualifications Framework. EQF. https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/tr/node/1440

5. Fitt, M. H., Walker, A. E., & Leary, H. M. (2009). Assessing the quality of doctoral dissertation literature reviews in instructional technology. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association San Diego, 3-15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3