Affiliation:
1. East Texas Baptist University, USA
Abstract
This chapter provides a practical guide for university faculty on how to construct assessments that measure true student learning rather than recall and immediate knowledge. Guidance on the use of assessment to align and scaffold student learning to meet both course and programmatic outcomes is provided. The major portion of this chapter deals with the discussion of assessment types that are appropriate to measure the six different levels of Bloom's taxonomy at both the course and program level to assist students in attaining skills in analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of content. The chapter includes a discussion on variety and authenticity in assessment as well as consideration of student learning styles. The use of grading and mastery rubrics to measure performance on assessments is also included to provide a rounded approach to the assessment process.
Reference67 articles.
1. Ahmad, N. N., & Dzulkarnain, S. S. (2020). Utilization of Gardner's Multiple Intelligence Theory for a school counseling system with usability testing. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 6(6), 2253-2260.
2. AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
3. E-assessment in higher education: A review.;M.Appiah;International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research,2018
4. Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment
5. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning.;S. O.Bada;Journal of Research & Method in Education,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Traditional and Emerging Instructional Design Models;The Impact and Importance of Instructional Design in the Educational Landscape;2023-06-30