A Critical Reflection and Feedback on Peer Teaching in the Era of Online Teaching

Abstract

The term “peer review” is familiar to academics. This phrase is commonly used when submitting research articles to peer-reviewed journals. There is a lot of information available on peer review of academic articles. However, peer evaluation of teaching, particularly peer observation, has been rare. PGCAP, on the other hand, took a different approach. Instead of reviewing the study paper, “peer review” reviews peers' work. Reviewing and being reviewed by peers forced the authors to pause and reflect twice. Is this the best way to evaluate coworkers regardless of their expertise? This study's analytical method is structured reflection. Reflective thinking has a long and distinguished history when it comes to making informed and rational educational decisions and assessing their consequences. This study found that a reflective diary helped online students learn and progress by providing a forum for self-assessment, self-reflection, goal setting, and collaborative critique. This study looks at collaborative or peer review.