Exploring Cybersecurity, Misinformation, and Interference in Voting and Elections Through Cyberspace

Author:

Muller S. Raschid1ORCID,Burrell Darrell Norman2ORCID,Nobles Calvin3ORCID,Mingo Horace C.2ORCID,Vassilakos Andreas3

Affiliation:

1. Arizona State University, USA

2. Marymount University, USA

3. Illinois Institute of Technology, USA

Abstract

Interference in the election process from both abroad and within the United States has produced chaos and confusion in business markets, communities, and among voters. Elections have become less reliable as a result of misleading statements. Election deniers are actively working to undermine confidence in our elections and suppress turnout, particularly among voters of color and other communities that have historically been marginalized. The false information spread, which includes lies about the voting process and election workers, has the potential to have significant repercussions for people's abilities to vote and their faith in our elections. Election misinformation poses a threat to democratic processes in the United States. Sixty-four percent of election officials reported in 2022 that spreading false information had made their jobs more dangerous. This chapter uses emerging content from extant literature to discuss cyberpsychology and the complex dynamics of these issues with a primary focus on finding solutions to these problems.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference52 articles.

1. Aftergood, S. (2017). Cybersecurity: The cold war online. Nature, 57, 30–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/547030a

2. Akamai Technologies. (2020). W at is a botnet attack?https://www.akamai.com/us/en/resources/what-is-a-botnet.jsp

3. Anderson, A., & Raine, L. (2020). Concerns about democracy in the digital age. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/21/concerns-about-democracy-in-the-digital-age/

4. Andrews, N. (2018). McCaskill says Senate Office was target of phishing scam. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/mccaskill-says-senate-office-was-target-of-phishing-scam1532656049

5. Badawy, A., Addawood, A., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2019). Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA influence campaign. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 9(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0578-6

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cybersecurity's Shaping of Wearable Healthcare Devices and Digital Marketing;Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics;2024-04-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3