Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher, Germany
2. University of Picardie Jules Verne, France
3. University of National and World Economy, Bulgaria
Abstract
This chapter analyses to what extent the type of monetary regime in three Balkans countries (Bulgaria, Romania, and Serbia) determines the scope and nature of reactions to the pandemic crisis in the short run (providing liquidity to different sectors) and considers the possibilities for a long-term recovery. A comparative perspective is particularly suitable for the Balkan countries with great institutional diversity of the monetary regimes. In particular, the two members of the EU, Bulgaria and Romania, have been following different principles of monetary regimes for decades (Currency Board versus discretionary Monetary Policy). Both Bulgaria and Romania follow closely the ECB monetary policy. Serbia, which is outside the EU, is not affected by the constraints of European integration and actually has its independent monetary policy (although the Euro is also an important external anchor).
Reference46 articles.
1. The institutional context of a sustainable workforce;K.Begall;Investments in a Sustainable Workforce in Europe,2019
2. Bulgarian National Bank. (2020a). The BNB implements, within its mandate, a package of measures worth BGN 9.3 billion in relation to the COVID 19 pandemic. Press release on 19 March.
3. Bulgarian National Bank (2020b), The Governing Council of the Bulgarian National Bank approved the draft Procedure for Deferral and Settlement of Liabilities Payable to Banks and their Subsidiaries – Financial Institutions. Press release on 10 April.
4. Eichenbaum, M. S., Rebelo, S., & Trabandt, M. (2020). The Macroeconomics of Epidemics. NBER Working Paper No. 26882.