Why Hair Isn't Just Hair

Author:

Boyd Khadija1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Northcentral University, USA

Abstract

Diversity, equity, and inclusion are used with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits workplace discrimination, to promote the representation and participation of its employees. However, some white men feel that DEI policies are unnecessary and play an influential role in implementing DEI policies while simultaneously being a threat to them. For this chapter, the author will focus on the discriminatory definition of professionalism, its imposition on DEI, and the undermining of Title VII through hair discrimination. The author argues that white supremacy culture and its definition of professionalism engages in four mechanisms– devaluing and dehumanizing Blackness, removing Black identity and culture, forcing hegemonic ideologies rooted in anti-blackness, and controlling the bodily autonomy of Black women to answer the following research question: “Why is banning afro-textured natural hair and cultural Black hairstyles in the work environment a civil rights issue that contradicts DEI initiatives?”

Publisher

IGI Global

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3