Affiliation:
1. University of Northern Iowa, USA
Abstract
Ban-the-box policies were passed to help people with criminal backgrounds get jobs. These policies were developed after it became clear that large swaths of the population, primarily men of color, were being systematically disadvantaged and unable to obtain work. While initial research showed that these policies were successful, subsequent, more critical studies indicate that while ban-the-box policies help ex-felons obtain work generally, they may actually do more to hurt minority populations than they do to help. This happens because employers, lacking the information from “the box,” may be using other information, including statistical discrimination to determine who to hire. This chapter discusses this unintended consequence including its link with the race-neutrality of the policy and suggestions to fix it.
Reference52 articles.
1. Census: North Carolina. (1961). United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1961/dec/population-vol-01.html
2. Poverty Guidelines. (2018). United States Department of Health and Human Services. https://aspe.hhs.gov/2018-poverty-guidelines
3. Avery, B., & Lu, H. (2020). Ban the Box: U.S. cities, counties, and states adopt fair hiring policies. National Employment Law Project. https://www.nelp.org/publication/ban-the-box-fair-chance-hiring-state-and-local-guide/#Chart_of_Local_Fair_Chance_Policies
4. Reentry and the Ties that Bind: An Examination of Social Ties, Employment, and Recidivism
5. Labor Market Effects of Permitting Employer Access to Criminal History Records