The Rubric for Scientific Writing

Author:

Wright Katherine Landau1ORCID,Hodges Tracey S.2ORCID,Wenner Julianne A.3,McTigue Erin M.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Boise State University, USA

2. The Empowering Advocate, USA

3. Clemson University, USA

4. University of Stavanger, Norway

Abstract

A major challenge of assessing students' science writing derives from the need to simultaneously consider two criteria – scientific argumentation and rhetorical form. This challenge is confounded by a lack of standardized measures for scientific writing. Therefore, this study aimed to create and validate the rubric for scientific writing (RSW), which can be used to provide both formative and summative evaluations of students' scientific writing. Three science teachers and three English/language arts teachers independently used the rubric to score 75 authentic science writing samples from middle and high school classes. The teachers also participated in a focus group to provide in-depth feedback on the strengths, weaknesses, and practical classroom applications of the rubric. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the RSW produces valid and reliable scores of proper scientific argumentation and English rhetoric, which would allow future researchers and teachers to examine how instruction and interventions impact these two aspects of scientific writing.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference46 articles.

1. AAAS. (1990). Science for all Americans. https://www.aaas.org/programs/project-2061

2. Comparing an Inquiry‐based Approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic to Traditional Science Teaching Practices: Are there differences?

3. Perceived values of reading and writing in learning physics in secondary classrooms.;N.Alev;Scientific Research and Essays,2010

4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (Ed.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

5. Mitigating the Dangers of a Single Story

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3