Affiliation:
1. Tecnológico Superior de Jalisco, Mexico
2. Tecnológico Nacional de México, Ciudad Guzmán, Mexico
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the theoretical-conceptual relations between the frameworks of the organizational institutionalism and institutional logics, institutional economics and institutional distance, and the comparative institutionalism perspectives. The departing assumption is that economic, organizational, and comparative perspectives of the institutional theory have more similarities than differences in conceptual and theoretical assumptions. The method employed is meta-analytic cognition based on the analysis of a theoretical and conceptual literature review. The analysis concludes that the economic, organizational, and comparative institutional perspectives have theoretical differences anchored in economics, sociology, and political science leading to associated to distinct analysis levels, theoretical assumptions and explanations, boundary conditions, etc.
Reference124 articles.
1. AbolafiaM. (1996). Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street. Harvard University Press.
2. The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward.;R. V.Aguilera;Journal of International Business Studies,2019
3. Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond.;P. D.Aligica;Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions,2012
4. Conflicting logics? The role of HRM in a professional service firm.;J.Alvehus;Human Resource Management Journal,2018
5. Institutional Logics and Functionalist Differentiation Theory: Challenges and pathways forward