A Complex Systems Paradox of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management

Author:

Ghili Soheil1,Nazarian Serima2,Tavana Madjid3,Keyvanshokouhi Sepehr4,Isaai Mohammad Taghi4

Affiliation:

1. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA

2. DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA

3. Business Systems Analytics Department. La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

4. Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Many organizations are striving to survive and remain competitive in the current uncertain and rapidly changing economic environment. Businesses must innovate to face this volatility and maintain their competitiveness. Organizational learning is a complex process with many interrelated elements linking knowledge management with organizational innovation. In this paper we use several theories (i.e., organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, complexity theory, and systems theory) to discover and study the interrelationships among the organizational learning elements. The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) We identify organizational learning as a mediating variable between knowledge management and organizational innovation; (2) We further present a paradox where decisions that are expected to improve organizational learning, surprisingly do not work; and (3) We show this paradox is not the result of overlooking organizational learning elements, but rather, caused by neglecting to consider the complex interrelationships and interdependencies among them.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference74 articles.

1. Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a new understanding to improve management of symptomatic patients

2. Double loop learning in organizations.;C.Argyris;Harvard Business Review,1977

3. Does Market Orientation Facilitate Balanced Innovation Programs? An Organizational Learning Perspective

4. Barnett, C. (2001). Rethinking organizational learning theories: A review and synthesis of the primary literature. Unpublished manuscript, Whittemore School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3