Taxonomies of Debiasing Methods in Procurement Processes

Author:

Şen Kübra Tokatcı1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. İstanbul University, Turkey

Abstract

The decision-making process does not always take place under clear and definite conditions; in fact, uncertainty prevails in many cases. Therefore, decision-makers often make their decisions without a strategy, and they resort to heuristics in order to calculate probabilities accurately and reduce uncertainty. However, Tversky and Kahneman reported that despite their utility, these heuristics have the potential to generate systematic errors. These systematic errors are called “cognitive biases” in the literature. Researchers have identified numerous debiasing methods to address cognitive biases, and by the time of progress, debiasing methods needed to be classified as cognitive biases. Kaufmann developed a taxonomy of debiasing measures in five categories for supplier selection decisions and the existence of these dimensions was investigated in decision-making positions of the procurement department.

Publisher

IGI Global

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3